Blog

The key standardized beta coefficient (? = 0

The Goal Subscale Epistemology was also a significant predictor of therapist emphasis on the working alliance along the Goal subscale (e.g. client and therapist agreement on how to achieve the goals), F(2, 1093) = 4.92, p < .007 (R 2 = .009). 065) for the rationalist epistemology t(1093) = 2.16, p < .031, was in the positive direction. 075) for the constructivist epistemology t(1093) = 2.47, p < .014, was also in the positive direction along the Goal subscale. This was again inconsistent with the proposed hypothesis that the rationalist epistemology would have stronger leanings towards the Goal subscale in the therapist emphasis on working alliance compared to therapists with a constructivist epistemology.

The Bond Subscale Lastly, epistemology was also a significant predictor of the therapist emphasis on the working alliance along the Bond subscale (the development of a personal bond between the client and therapist), F(2, 1089) = , p < .001 (R 2 = .035). The standardized beta coefficient for the rationalist epistemology (? = – 0.034) was in the negative direction, but was not significant, t(1089) = –1.15, p < .249. For the constructivist epistemology, the standardized beta coefficient (? = 0.179) was significant t(1089) = 5.99, p < .0001, and in the positive direction along the Bond subscale. This supported the hypothesis that the rationalist epistemology is less inclined towards therapist emphasis on working alliance on the Bond subscale than the constructivist epistemology.

Therapists having an excellent constructivist epistemology tended to set more emphasis on the private bond regarding healing relationships versus practitioners with a great rationalist epistemology

The present day analysis indicated that counselor epistemology was a critical predictor of at least specific regions of the functional alliance. The strongest interested in was in reference to the introduction of a great private bond involving the consumer and you may counselor (Thread subscale). Which supporting the idea about literature one constructivist therapists place an increased focus on strengthening a quality therapeutic relationships described as, “allowed, insights, faith, and you may compassionate.

Hypothesis step 3-the selection of Particular Healing Treatments

The next and last study is made to target this new prediction one to epistemology might possibly be a http://datingranking.net/es/citas-de-viaje/ great predictor off counselor access to specific cures process. More particularly, that the rationalist epistemology tend to declaration using process from the intellectual behavioural therapy (age.grams. pointers giving) more constructivist epistemologies, and you may practitioners which have constructivist epistemologies have a tendency to declaration playing with process regarding the constructivist medication (e.g. emotional running) more than practitioners which have rationalist epistemologies). A simultaneous linear regression studies is actually conducted to choose in the event the predictor changeable (therapist epistemology) commonly influence therapist evaluations of the traditional details (therapy processes).

Epistemology was a significant predictor of cognitive behavioral therapy techniques F(2, 993) = , p < .001 (R 2 = .185). The standardized beta coefficient for the rationalist epistemology (? = 0.430) was significant, t(993) = , p < .001 and in the positive direction. The standardized beta coefficient for the constructivist epistemology (? = 0.057) was significant and in the positive direction t(993) = 1.98, p < .05. This supported the hypothesis that the rationalist epistemology would have stronger leanings of therapist use of cognitive behavioral techniques when conducting therapy than constructivist epistemologies.

Finally, epistemology was a significant predictor of constructivist therapy techniques F(2, 1012) = , p < .001 (R 2 = .138). The standardized beta coefficient for the rationalist epistemology (? = – 0.297) was significant t(1012) = –, p < .0001 and in the negative direction. The standardized beta coefficient for the constructivist epistemology (? = 0.195) was significant t(1012) = 6.63, p < .0001, and in the positive direction. This supported the hypothesis that the constructivist epistemology would place a stronger emphasis on therapist use of constructivist techniques when conducting therapy than rationalist epistemologies.